In a guest post, Barbara Oakley argues that our brains block out uncomfortable ideas that threaten our own view of the world – but that we can learn to be more open, even if we ultimately disagree.
Is this in essence the difference between a purely emotional and a purely rational response?
It is often difficult to cut through a debate using emotion with a rational argument?
Is this in essence the difference between a purely emotional and a purely rational response?
It is often difficult to cut through a debate using emotion with a rational argument?