A question I would like an answer to is whether there is any recourse when an elected government starts introducing policies clearly against its own manifesto?
The Purpose of Law Vol I - looks into : Failures of enforcement - Failures of Safeguarding - Failures of Consistency - Failures of Courage
Over the past year I began examining a recurring constitutional question:
What happens when equal protection under law remains formally intact, but its practical application becomes increasingly inconsistent?
The first volume of The Purpose of Law explores recurring patterns across safeguarding, public order, procedural fairness, lawful expression, and institutional discretion.
The central concern is not political ideology, but whether delayed recognition of harm, inconsistent enforcement, and expanding discretion are gradually weakening public trust in the legal framework itself.
The paper does not argue for new laws. It asks whether existing legal protections are being applied consistently enough to preserve confidence in equal protection under law.
If anyone working in law, governance, academia, public policy, or institutional accountability is interested, I’m happy to share the paper privately via email as I’ve not figured out how to send it via DM
I don't think a comedy show is an appropriate response to the increasingly alarming if not tragic situation the UK is now in with not just an incompetent but a malevolent government. At least you are doing something to stem the rising tide of Stalinism. As usual I notice most of the pews in the Lords like the Commons are empty.
A question I would like an answer to is whether there is any recourse when an elected government starts introducing policies clearly against its own manifesto?
The Purpose of Law Vol I - looks into : Failures of enforcement - Failures of Safeguarding - Failures of Consistency - Failures of Courage
Over the past year I began examining a recurring constitutional question:
What happens when equal protection under law remains formally intact, but its practical application becomes increasingly inconsistent?
The first volume of The Purpose of Law explores recurring patterns across safeguarding, public order, procedural fairness, lawful expression, and institutional discretion.
The central concern is not political ideology, but whether delayed recognition of harm, inconsistent enforcement, and expanding discretion are gradually weakening public trust in the legal framework itself.
The paper does not argue for new laws. It asks whether existing legal protections are being applied consistently enough to preserve confidence in equal protection under law.
If anyone working in law, governance, academia, public policy, or institutional accountability is interested, I’m happy to share the paper privately via email as I’ve not figured out how to send it via DM
Thank you for sharing your thoughts
I don't think a comedy show is an appropriate response to the increasingly alarming if not tragic situation the UK is now in with not just an incompetent but a malevolent government. At least you are doing something to stem the rising tide of Stalinism. As usual I notice most of the pews in the Lords like the Commons are empty.